How motorcyclists can vote this election

election poll vote voting

Which ever shade of politics revs you up, there is little on offer from the political parties specifically for motorcyclists in this federal election.

MotorbikeWriter does not support any one politician or party, so we approached them all, asking for their motorcycle-specific policies as we have done in previous federal elections.

This time we only received responses from the Liberals, Nationals and Liberal Democrats.

Electric election

Electric vehicles have sparked some debate in this election.

The Coalition believes electric vehicles will make up 25-50% of new passenger vehicles by 2030, Labor wants a target of 50% and the Greens have called for 100%.

No matter what targets our parties set, it is largely out of their hands.

We no longer have a car industry and the imports will be determined by foreign car companies who will probably reach those targets anyway. For example, Sweden will not be making any internal combustion vehicles by 2030.

No party makes any mention of electric motorcycles in their election policies.

Solar Cake Kalk electric motorcycles standardise election
Electric motorcycles are coming

Labor

While Labor didn’t reply, we note that their Transport Minister Anthony Albanese has long been a strong supporter of motorcycles and scooters.

He has said that attracting more riders as commuters would ease traffic congestion and reduce the pressure on public transport and road infrastructure.

“Albo” reckons Labor would would work with local governments and rider organisations to increase safe parking for motorcycles and scooters in cities and remove “regulatory and other impediments to motorcycle use”.

Coalition

The Liberals and Nationals both responded with almost identical references to their infrastructure plans which make no reference to motorcycles.

In fact, if they did encourage more people on to two-wheelers, they wouldn’t need to spend as much of our taxpayers dollars on improving infrastructure.

You can read the Coalition infrastructure plan here.

They also referred to the National Road Safety Action Plan 2018-20, which includes a number of motorcycle safety issues:

  • Increased understanding about the use of appropriate protective clothing through the MotoCAP rating scheme;
  • Recognition of the importance of infrastructure design and maintenance;
  • Targeted safety campaigns and information sharing;
  • Improved vehicle safety, including through technology such as mandatory anti-lock braking systems (ABS); and
  • Enhanced motorcycle training and education.

Their action plan for further motorcycle safety issues include:

  • Development of network-wide safety plans such as unspecified roadside barriers and motorcycle underrun barriers;
  • Infrastructure and speed reduction at urban intersections including more speed/red light cameras
  • Improved road design;
  • Safe System approaches to support better outcomes for specific road users; and
  • Implementation of “safer speeds” and improved enforcement.

Liberal Democrats

Former Lib/Dem Senator David Leyonhjelm who quit and unsuccessfully stood for the NSW Upper House is a rider and forged their party’s motorcycle policy in 2016.

Now, Senator Duncan Spender has taken David’s place.

The Liberal Democrats believe those who choose to use motorcycles and scooters should not be discouraged by government policies,” he says.

“The use of motorcycles and scooters is a matter of individual choice. So long as nobody else is likely to be harmed, the government has no right to interfere in personal choices.

“Riding motorcycles and scooters eases traffic congestion, produces less emissions and is often a more economical choice. Unfortunately, not only are motorcyclists and scooter riders invisible to many car drivers, they are also largely invisible to governments of both persuasions. The National Road Safety Strategy has repeatedly failed to closely examine motorcycle issues, despite motorcyclists being at greater risk of being killed or seriously injured compared to occupants of other vehicles.

“While the government acknowledges that the number of motorcyclists are growing, governments turn to increased prohibition and regulation instead of encouraging and enhancing the trend. Road rules, parking provisions and infrastructure should facilitate motorcycling, not inhibit it.”

Red tape

Senator Spender says the National Road Safety Strategy to increase licensing requirements would increase red tape.

“There are numerous barriers to the establishment of rider training courses, not only barriers faced by small businesses anywhere in Australia but also specific barriers relating to issues such as liability,” he says.

“As a result there is a shortage of accessible, affordable rider training courses.”

The Lib Dems have also launched a Support Sensible Speed Limits campaign which recognises that limits “tend to be set using an over-cautious approach instead of a balanced and democratic one”.

“This campaign also calls for an end to revenue raising and an increase of speed limits on motorways such as the Hume Highway in NSW,” he says.

Vote early

election poll vote voting
Pre-polling

Vote early, vote often, so they say! Well, you can vote early, but you can only vote once.

Just because Saturday is election day doesn’t mean you have to miss out on a weekend ride.

About one-third of the eligible voters will already have voted by election day, up from about 8% in 2007 and 22% in 2016.

Voters previously needed a valid excuse to cast a pre-poll vote, but now the only question you they ask is whether you have already voted in this election.

So vote before Saturday and go for a ride.

Pre-polling stations are open from 8am to 5.30pm. Click here to find the closest station in your electorate.

7 Comments

  1. One word with any new transport being introduced in Australia ‘Infrastructure’
    Australia needs mass power production & EV supply stations Australia wide.
    Don’t forget rechargeable batteries don’t last forever average 10 years & pollution of discarded units.
    Without these, we go nowhere………….. :/

  2. Australian politics , no matter which party gets in we lose and they don’t really care if they get elected they still get a ridiculous pension and more perks than you can poke a stick at.
    Wouldn’t it be great if we could sack the lot of them and put in a caretaker government like has happened with some corrupt councils.

  3. In every other respect the Liberal Democrats are idiots. As much as readers of this site, including me, love motorcycling, there are much more important issues to consider when voting at this election, such as the conservatives’ lack of action on global warming. Transport concerns are mostly state issues anyway.

    1. LDP have a policy list on their site that already covers the much more important issues though, their policies are essentially keeping the government out of environment management because they are just not good at it, Murray Darling/Water Management act 2k7 being a classic example, and anyone serious about climate action would legalize nuclear, which LDP are in favor of.

      1. Thanks for helping to prove my point. Nuclear is lunacy; apart from the dangers, no nuclear plant has ever actually paid for itself. Commercially, it is completely unviable. I rest my case.

        1. That doesn’t help to prove your point at all.

          If you wanted a low emission, high yield and safe form of power generation, nuclear fuel is all we’ve got that ticks those boxes. Startup capital is significant compared to fossil generation granted, but I’ve never heard of one that didn’t pay for itself.

          Regarding your concerns, I doubt me explaining it would really do it justice;

          https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/03/11/it-sounds-crazy-but-fukushima-chernobyl-and-three-mile-island-show-why-nuclear-is-inherently-safe/?fbclid=IwAR3_VV6ixgCaJ-SYWGqV-1JmoBVmzdZRA7A_BCWApmTlY_k7veAEmAQ-8zY#3cc33d931688

          Whos the real lunatic? People who want all forms of energy to compete with each other without subsidies or someone who’s very quick to ‘settle the case’ by claiming such unfounded assertions as yours?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.